108 Page INTERROGATION: A REVIEW OF THE SCIENCE - FBI CIA DOD Studies on Data CD

Description: Thank You! If you do not wish to have your item(s) delivered on data disc(s), I can provide them on a flash drive and other means as well. Just let me know if a disc does not work for you and we can discuss delivery by other methods. COMBINING SHIPPING COSTS Are you purchasing multiple items? I will: a) combine all invoices before payment and charge shipping equivalent to one item, or b) refund all shipping costs in excess of one item after payment. U.S. Government publication copied to data CD - no paper copy provided! All derivative (i.e. change in media; by compilation) work from this underlying U.S. Government public domain/public release data is COPYRIGHT © GOVPUBS $3.00 first class shipping in U.S.; $13.00 for air post outside of United States. I will combined auctions for reduced postage prior to payment - simply ask for a combined invoice! See numerous images of actual pages within manual. Be sure to see my many other manuals on data CD auctions. Studies included individually and as one combined PDF: 1. INTERROGATION: A REVIEW OF THE SCIENCE HIGH-VALUE DETAINEE INTERROGATION GROUP SEPTEMBER 2016, 94 pages & 2. INTERROGATION BEST PRACTICES HIGH-VALUE DETAINEE INTERROGATION GROUP AUGUST 26, 2016, 14 pages FOREWORD THE HIGH-VALUE DETAINEE INTERROGATION GROUP The High-Value Detainee Interrogation Group (HIG) is a specialized interagency interrogation capability that brings together intelligence professionals, subject matter experts, and an international and multi-disciplinary team of researchers. Since its creation in January 2010, the HIG has served as the locus for advancing the science and practice of interrogation within the United States government. To date, the HIG has commissioned a body of scientific research on interrogation that has resulted in more than 100 publications in peer-reviewed scientific journals. Equally important, this research has been incorporated into HIG best practices via a continuous cycle of research advising training, training informing operations, and operational experience identifying research gaps and updating training models. SCOPE OF THE REPORT The objective of this report is to provide a systematic review and evidence synthesis of the science related to interrogation. It is not intended as a manual or practitioners’ guide. The emerging science of interrogation relies on a variety of relevant disciplines and fields of study for its theoretical and scientific foundations, many of which have provided decades of data. For instance, research on interrogations in the criminal justice system has been steadily accumulating for decades, providing data on topics such as effective and ineffective interrogation and interview methods, the conditions under which victim, witness, and suspect memories are most vulnerable, valid cues to deception, and the conditions under which individuals confess to crimes they did not commit. During the same period, there has been an emergence and growth of science on negotiation and social influence, persuasion, resistance, priming and embodied cognition, and cognitive-based cues to deception. To the extent that this research is relevant to an interrogation, it is included in this report. This report provides a comprehensive review of HIG-funded research and other science relevant to interrogations: assessing cooperation and countering resistance (Chapter 1), influencing tactics (Chapter 2), interview methods (Chapter 3), and detecting truth and deception (Chapter 4). Based on the comprehensive research and field validation studies detailed in this report, it is concluded that the most effective practices for eliciting accurate information and actionable intelligence are non-coercive, rapportbased, information-gathering interviewing and interrogation methods. METHODOLOGY The HIG supports research and development of an effective, science-based model of interrogation. To this end, the HIG Research Program commissions basic and applied science and field validation studies to rigorously examine current and new approaches to interrogation. Interdisciplinary and cross-domain in scope, researchers have devised novel experimental paradigms (e.g., mock terrorism scenarios, induced cheating paradigms and multiparty negotiations) to systematically evaluate existing and proposed interrogation techniques in real and/or simulated interrogation contexts. A majority of the findings discussed in this report arose from laboratory settings with a diverse population and methodology (e.g., surveys, in-depth interviews, and experimental manipulations), which allow for identification of cause and effect relationships. In contrast, field validation studies (e.g., analyses of actual interviews and interrogations recordings) allow assessment of the impact of the science-based methods in real-world settings. To the extent that field validation studies are available, they are included in this report. Together, the laboratory and field data provide complementary insights and best practices to be translated into training and operational environments. Notably, some readers may observe that a majority of the field research cited has been conducted within law enforcement settings (e.g., field validation study of interrogations with the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center [FLETC]) and assume, therefore, that the data and findings are not relevant to military/intelligence interrogations. However, the goal of collecting information is often true in criminal interrogations as well. The underlying processes of communication, decision-making, memory, cognition, and social dynamics are fundamentally the same in the law enforcement and intelligence gathering settings. There are fewer field data from intelligence contexts because there have been fewer opportunities to study interrogations in military/intelligence settings, especially since the implementation of DoD Instruction 3216.02, Protection of Human Subjects and Adherence to Ethical Standards, which prohibits any human subjects research involving detainees, including observational studies. TERMINOLOGY This report uses the terms “interrogation” and “interview” interchangeably and generally follows the Department of Defense definition of an interrogation to mean, “the systematic process of using approved interrogation approaches to question a captured or detained person to obtain reliable information to satisfy intelligence requirements, consistent with applicable law and policy” (AFM, 2006, 1-20). The subject of an interrogation is referred to as the “subject.” PROTECTIONS OF HUMAN SUBJECTS OF RESEARCH The HIG conducts its mission consistent with domestic law and United States’ obligations under international law, and the research program adheres to applicable U.S. government guidelines for scientific experimentation and the protection of human subjects in scientific research. The Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects or "Common Rule" mandates that researchers abide by the principles of respect for persons, beneficence, and justice; these regulations have been adopted by federal agencies that conduct, support, or otherwise regulate human subject research. PEER REVIEW PER OMB GUIDANCE M-05-03 An earlier draft of this report was peer-reviewed in a manner consistent with the requirements of the Office of Management and Budget’s “Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review” (M-05-03) issued December 16, 2004. These reviews are summarized in Appendix A. AGENCY REVIEW This report was reviewed by FBI, CIA, USD(I), DIA, USMC, and Army G2X. High-Value Detainee Interrogation Group The High-Value Detainee Interrogation Group (HIG) is a three-agency entity—FBI, Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), and Department of Defense (DoD)—established in 2009 that brings together intelligence professionals to conduct interrogations that strengthen national security and are consistent with the rule of law. The director of the HIG is an FBI representative and has two deputies—one from the DoD and the other from the CIA. The HIG is staffed by trained professionals from across the U.S. Intelligence Community. Though the HIG is administered by the FBI, it is a multi-agency organization whose principal function is intelligence gathering—not law enforcement. The HIG is subject to oversight by the National Security Council, Department of Justice, and Congress.Interrogations The HIG deploys expert Mobile Interrogation Teams to collect intelligence that will protect national security. The teams have deployed both within the United States and abroad. Team members have extensive interviewing and interrogation experience, and they are trained based on the latest scientific research. HIG personnel do not engage in any unlawful interrogation practices. They use authorized, lawful, non-coercive techniques that are designed to elicit voluntary statements. For more information, read the HIG’s Interrogation Best Practices Report, which summarizes best practices for interrogations.Research The HIG’s Research Program studies the effectiveness of interrogation approaches and techniques. HIG researchers identify and test existing techniques and develop lawful, new techniques that may be more effective. The HIG identifies research gaps and commissions research to fill those gaps. To carry out the research, the HIG contracts with world-renowned, Ph.D.-level scientists known for their expertise in interrogations and other related fields. The HIG has funded more than 100 interrogation research projects on topics such as social influence tactics, the impact of interpreters, the cognitive interview, and science-based methods of detecting deception. All HIG research is conducted in compliance with U.S. and international laws concerning the protection of human research subjects.Training The HIG works to develop and disseminate best practices to its own interrogators and part-time personnel and to other U.S. Intelligence Community and law enforcement partners and allies within the U.S. and abroad.

Price: 14.99 USD

Location: Springfield, Ohio

End Time: 2024-09-09T12:31:19.000Z

Shipping Cost: 3 USD